The AI transition is not negotiable. It is not escapable. It is not reversible on any timescale that matters to the people alive now. It will affect the countries that built the AI foundations and the nations that did not, the industries that invested early and the companies that did not, the generations that grew up with it and the generations that will inherit what it becomes. It will not wait for the institutions responsible for governing it to catch up with what it is. It will not wait for the public responsible for those institutions to catch up with what is happening to them.
The Code After Series is an attempt to give institutions and the public a framework they can use in the time that remains before the new architecture hardens. The attempt may fail. The framework may be wrong. The writing may not reach. The pace of AI may outstrip the pace of the analysis. The readers who need the work most may never encounter it. These failure modes are understood, and accepted as the cost of attempting the work at all.
What is not acceptable is not attempting it. The subject matter is too large and the stakes too widely distributed for the absence of the work to be defensible. If the series fails, it will have failed at something worth failing at. If it succeeds, it will have helped give the majority of the world a framework through which to understand and engage with a transition that has so far been conducted without them.
The work now moves from argument to publication.
Join the discussion
Become a member of Code After AI to start commenting.
Sign up now